(Seriously, it seems like everything in my life post-DX has an MS tag attached to it! I try not to let it define me, but there it is. And that's what this post is going to be about, in a weird and roundabout way.)
----
WHAT IS THIS MOVIE REALLY ABOUT?
Okay, the hero-fool of the story, Chris McCandless, a real guy who endured most (if not all) of the events recounted in the movie, stepped out into the world as a tramp ("Alexander Supertramp," to be precise) ostensibly to cast off material illusion, injustice and conformity to aspire to life as a modern-day Thoreau.
(I say hero-fool because the lines are clearly drawn in the sand between those who thought he was either. Me, I think he was unapologetically human and broken and if you find it easy to boil his story down to either the hero or the fool, you are missing the point.)
McCandless ended up in a bus in the outlands of Alaska after a vagabond's trip across the United States. Spoiler alert! Yes, he died. He died, in many ways, a stupid death.
Let's be real. This was not the story of an idealistic 20th century Kerouac. Did anyone not listen to McCandless's sister's voiceover about how messed up their family was? Violence, deep family secrets, betrayals, passive aggression, alcoholism, the twin oppressions of social expectation and privilege. McCandless's sister Carine still maintains the story that they were one effed-up sinking ship of a family.
Herein lies the true, if more inescapably difficult to manifest, root of all of McCandless's problems. He mostly hit the road to escape the realities of his grossly dysfunctional family and the larger ingrained demands of our society to live the "good life" that did not match what he'd learned while studying political injustice around the world: the need to conform, to go to college, to make money, to conspicuously consume at the cost of others, etc.
This understory is often lost on those who would criticize director Sean Penn for romanticizing McCandless as a modern-day John Muir. Or lost on those who think the whole story was about survival. Like Survivor is all about physical survival, right? Wrong.
(Too bad McCandless didn't live long enough to see a few episodes of Survivor, he might have caught on to the whole "social game" aspect that has led so many otherwise unfit players to grab the brass ring at the end.)
But I digress.
What people fail to note while watching this movie are all the signs along the way that point to McCandless's biggest blind spot (which I just hinted at).
It wasn't that he didn't bring all the tools he needed. He had maps, he had money, he had a fishing pole which he never used and a lighter and even books on edible wild plants. And he did, in fact, live out in the wild for almost 200 days, which I think most Americans would not be able to do even if they had a full arsenal of survivalist tools available to them.
(Sorry, America, but y'all are soft and stupid and lacking in basic wisdom even about your own body, but that's another blog post entirely.)
His blind spot was revealed by himself in ink he inscribed on a page in Tolstoy's Family Happiness at the end of the movie:
"Happiness only real when shared." (sic)
DON'T GET ME STARTED...
Ugh, happiness. Now there's a loaded word. Right up there with love and beauty.
Happiness. The ultimate American dream, right? But what does that mean, anyway? I don't think it was happiness itself, or even family happiness, that McCandless desired (whatever these things are). I think McCandless wanted to unravel the lies that had been woven into his personal mythology by parents more interested in rewriting reality to serve a greater social expectation they'd become slaves to (it's a generational problem.... remember the term, "Mistakes were made?").
Of course he and his sister Carine were casualties of that appalling cover up. McCandless just wanted to write his own story instead. And sometimes you have to go back, way back, to the very beginning, and start over, and be as far away from the Big Lie of Who You Are as told by Somebody Else in order to do that.
Oh, and there was love by the bucketload in this movie. Real love. From his sister. His roadie friends. Ronald Hanz' love for McCandless spilled out of his eyes so fiercely at the end I couldn't help but bawl along with him. And McCandless loved people back, even perfect strangers like the old fella who needed a quarter for a pay phone so he could patch up a tiff with his loved one.
And there was beauty in the broad American landscape McCandless traversed, from the gorgeous southwestern hoodoo regions to the relentless Colorado River, South Dakota's fertile wheat fields, the sparkling Sea of Cortez and the epic northern Californian coastline. (Though Sean Penn's version of Alaska apparently doesn't mirror McCandless's reality of bogs and mosquitoes and zilcho scenics).
Even poets will tell you that happiness and love and beauty are throwaway words in the 21st century. These idyllic words have grown so broad in their usage that they no longer hold real meaning in a world where linguistic nuance is lost and we are left to rely on icons and emoticons just to get through the day.
The passage was something McCandless wrote about three weeks before he died. And in fact, shortly after he read a specific paragraph in Family Happiness, which extolled the virtues of surrounding oneself with people to achieve happiness (why he didn't see this before, I can't say... maybe he hadn't read this book yet), McCandless packed up and tried to leave. If there was any brilliance to be found in that tragically dysfunctional genius of his, it was that he finally grasped that living alone in the wild was a huge mistake and probably the quickest path to his own death.
The drive to survive is nothing if not irrefutable when it kicks in. Too bad the river wouldn't let him cross back over to the real world.
SURVIVAL MECHANISMS
How it took so long for his drive to survive to kick in, we'll never know. I suspect it has to do with the constant emotional abuse from his father that taught him to believe that he didn't deserve love. Which did not make McCandless suicidal, by the way, it just meant he did not learn the truth to his survival soon enough to change his outcome. I also think he was physiologically incapable of good sense at this point, in early starvation, perhaps.
Or maybe my theory here holds true as well, that like the rest of us, he's soft and stupid while being overeducated. It happens all the time. There's book smart and then there's street smart, right? He'd been reading these books over and over for the whole of his trip. He'd probably read them more than once even prior to tripping after graduation; they were probably assigned reading in some social justice class he'd taken. Books that took on the weight of the Bible in his life.
Ponder that for a minute.
 | ||||||
| Books McCandless read along his sojourn included London's The Call of the Wild, Thoreau's Walden, Pasternak's Doctor Zhivago, L'Amour's Education of a Wandering Man, Byron's "There is a Pleasure in the Pathless Woods" and, most notably and ironically, Tolstoy's Family Happiness. |
In fact, the college education he seemed to despise so much was probably the greatest fuel behind his decision to hit the road. O! the irony of that.
Clearly his book learnin' overtook his own street savvy ability to observe people he encountered in real life. The whole world shared something with him. And in doing so, they were giving him bits of happiness. And love. And beauty. From truckers who gave him rides, to strangers giving him hot dogs from their grills, to farmers who hired him, to hippies who treated him like their own son, to a 16-year-old girl who offered her body to him (another example of the primal drive to survive), to an elderly man who asked to adopt him (and who also taught McCandless how to fish and gave him a fishing pole.)
And what about all the other messages he failed to process, like being told by his fast-food boss that he needed to wear socks to work (because it's a rule, which he couldn't abide) while he worked along a sign that said "It is okay to waste fries." He compromised his values all along the path to his own death, justifying it all by saying he was going to live above and beyond the cruelty and depravity of societal norms.
For me, the survival instinct is less about starting over and more about making the most of what I already have. Mostly this gives me gigantic advantages over our hero-fool McCandless. I have great friends, adequate insurance, supportive family, an awesome health care team, a functional MS community. I have lived enough years to understand that I am in charge of my own happiness. I see the value of the gray area between extremes. But that's just me.
What did he have? A sister who was equally a bastard child and powerless to help him. A bunch of money to put toward a life he didn't want. A falsified personal history and identity courtesy his father. A bunch of books from a different time and space to advise him in ways that weren't practical, but esoteric--great for philosophy discussion but not so much for getting by. No sense that maybe he could rewrite his story without abandoning the real world for a fantasy of solitude. The only social constructs he could relate to were subcultures also left to teeter along the fringe. He was just as young and stupid as his parents were when they graduated from college.
...SO YOU'RE ASKING, HOW DOES THIS RELATE TO MS?
Here's a guy embarking on a magical mystery tour... he's educated himself on philosophies about the imbalances in the world... he even trains himself with calisthenics, keeps recorded documents, prepares (however incompletely) for his big intentional lurch into the unknown. It's a spiritual journey, and I'll give him points for that. This effort elevates him above the vast majority of Americans who can't be bothered to entertain the notion of an interior life.
Then he dies because, for all that book learning, all that spiritual seeking, he cannot fend off the very real impact of starvation and self-imposed isolation on his physical reality. Hero, or fool?
I can kinda relate, and kinda NOT relate.
MS is, itself, a magical mystery tour... you don't know what you are in for, except for what you have experienced in the past, much of which prior to diagnosis has escaped definition or any kind of connection to your future. What do I mean by that? I mean that all that fatigue I experienced in my early 20s, the sudden shingles and weird health issues in 2001-2002, a repeat case of mononucleosis, a prior misdiagnosis of narcolepsy... together, these and other symptom clusters in my life have led to the reality that is, today, my MS, but I had no way to know it then.
So I can only now look at the past to guess at my future, while knowing that it could be much worse for no good reason at all because we really don't even know for sure what causes MS to relapse, much less its root cause.
So I got myself an edu-ma-cation on MS (one that is probably better than most others', as I have research and interpretive skills in the medical field as well as privileged access to legitimate clinical studies that the average person can't find via Google without a password).
I still don't know just how MS affects me except in the obvious ways (digestive disorders, parasthesias, problems with executive function/multitasking, tiny electrical shocks, speech dysfunction, memory lapses and unrelenting fatigue). I don't know if the war between my central nervous system and my immune system has spread in my brain. Maybe it has and will leave me incapable of walking or seeing tomorrow.
I don't know if my disease modifying therapy is working. I don't know if my brain, while I am in the "off season" (I'm not in a flare), is remyelinating. Will my MRI in April reveal bigger and more lesions and white spots or will they all have shrunken down to nothing? Will it just seem like a bad dream, then?
So all the edu-ma-cation in the world still doesn't answer these questions, except in hindsight.
All of McCandless's edu-ma-cation did not answer his questions either. Or if it did, it wasn't until it was too late for him to apply what he learned.
Also He made choices that put him in his dire straits, whereas I am gifted the realities of a chronic illness not of my own making. Still, I hope to try not to repeat his mistakes. Will I be a hero or a fool? I don't think I will be either, I will be just as human and flawed as he was.
HOW TO FIX, OR NOT FIX, WHAT IS BROKEN
Enter the exploration of my own interior life, post-diagnosis. Expressions of it include:
However, if I were more like McCandless, who took some major risks, I might spend all the money I have in the world on underdeveloped and poorly understood endovascular surgery as a new strategy to treat CCSVI (chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency) which may or may not be linked to MS. It would require that I travel to a foreign country, have all of my spinal fluid swapped out for new fluid, and live in quarantine for months. It's not shown to cure MS, it's not covered by insurance and it's not approved by the FDA.
But I'm not going there. I am not in an all-or-nothing situation. To me, that's like cutting off my finger to heal a mosquito bite. If I was sicker, maybe my perspective would change. But that's not my reality. And I don't think it was McCandless's reality, either. He had other options that were less extreme. He just made different choices.
Also, unlike McCandless, I have not formally started a training routine like others with MS have, partially because:
As for the diet, I am relentless in my rejection of the notion of diet. Diets in America consist of self-deprivation, failures in common sense, major monetary expenditures, herd mentality and practices which are completely unsustainable. MS is not just happening to me "in the now," like McCandless's starvation did as a slow and gradual end game that ultimately could not be blamed on eating an inedible plant. My MS will happen forever, whether I eat candy bars or chia seeds, whether I sit on my ass all day long or complete a marathon.
And more about eating... and this is relevant because every single person I know with MS has encountered this from nonMSers to the point of oversaturation... All y'all please read this carefully:
Cutting out whole food groups to "heal" my MS is careless, stressful and unsustainable, and my naturopath has already confirmed I don't need to cut out anything but foods with sulfites (usually meaning wine, certain kinds of dried fruit and cured meats, all of which I can easily live without). So yes, I'm eating gluten and sugar. And so are people who say they are gluten-free or Paleo. They are secretly (or, in some cases, ignorantly) eating gluten and sugar. Even the true Celiac sufferers I know break down from time to time.
In this way, McCandless and I are on the same page: we just want the truth. Here's one for ya: Diets to cure neurological conditions are a FUCKING LIE, people. Neurological conditions are not metabolic in origin. Diets DO NOT CURE most chronic or serious illnesses that are not metabolic in origin.
I've also kept records like McCandless, though they are fewer and far between because I am between flare ups (I think? I'm still trying to figure this out..) and there's nothing new to record that can't be explained by my own bad behavior (not getting enough sleep, too much emotional stress, eating fat too late at night, etc.).
I have also prepared in some ways for my big lurch into the unknown by cobbling together a mini yoga studio in my office, investing in comfortable shoes, napping before I head off to work at the sleep lab, and saying No to the daily demands that side-swipe every parent in American nearly every day of their life (i.e. to bake cookies, sell tickets, drive kids, organize a car wash, attend a board meeting, revise a phone tree, volunteer at the play, set up for the swim meet, etc etc and etc.).
In this way, I am also like McCandless. My journey is decidedly an imperfect practice, a work in progress. I can probably do more. He could have probably done more. His life was also a work in progress. So is yours. Somewhere between all that planning and philosophizing, one has to actually live. And I have a family and a job and friends that matter just as much as the battle against the war inside me.
HOW IT WILL ALL END
So... going back to the truth... The truth is, I will die, just like McCandless.
Obviously, my distaste for diets means I won't die of starvation. But I will die because, heck, we all die. You will die, too. Sometimes people take risks or make lousy choices, and they die. And sometimes people live sheltered or impeccable lives and, guess what? They die, too! The truth sucks, no?
I might die tomorrow of a stroke. I might die on the day of my daughter's graduation of a urinary tract infection that the MS can't abide. I might die ten years from now because someone didn't vaccinate their kid on philosophical grounds, leaving me to cough up a pertussic lung in a hospital after encountering their darling precious little germ factory at Safeway. I might get hit by a bus on my 65th birthday. I might fall down the stairs at the old folks home because of my MS. I might have a heart attack, which is more in line with my familial reality, while in my 80s.
In my 80s. So if I die in my 80s, then I lived a full life, right? Right??
However, I won't die by isolating myself from society.
Hey, I know what McCandless is fighting against. Society is full of shitheads, complete morons, bigots, twisted family monarchs and automatons. But it's also full of lightworkers, geniuses, selfless strangers, peacemakers, and freethinkers with hearts and souls at least the size of the bus McCandless co-opted in INTO THE WILD. I see these people every day in my life: they walk around thinly disguised as old friends, new friends, people on the ferry, service providers, random teenagers, voices on the phone.
So you can also rest well knowing that I probably won't die of suicide; that's something I feel I can safely put out there. I love people too much. The good ones, anyway. The ones who share, the ones with whom I can share.
Remember, it wasn't as if McCandless was miserable 100 percent of the time while on his journey. He certainly wasn't miserable while belly laughing with Mr. Hanz on the top of the hill, and he wasn't miserable while enjoying his handmade shower in Alaska or accompanying his "girlfriend" Tracy in a song at Slab City or swimming in the ocean, despite the fact he had a deep fear of water. His journey overflowed with joy, even over the taste and texture of a perfect apple (one of my favorite scenes, actually).
On the other hand, McCandless used a hat woven for him by a potential surrogate mother as a trail marker across the river; it was still there when he finally got the clue that maybe happiness was meant to be spent out in the world made most beautiful by those who loved him, but by then it was too late for him. He did not see the orange knit cap as the truth beacon it was. How very tragic, that a handmade gift could have delivered Tolstoy's message weeks, months to McCandless before he set off for Alaska.
One could say the other difference between us is that I don't deserve the MS, that he deserved to die of starvation. And another argument might be that McCandless did all this to himself and I didn't. Both are pretty flimsy.
What does it mean to deserve anything? Did OxFam not deserve his check for $25K? Did his friend Mr. Hanz deserve to lose his wife and child while away serving in the war? Did McCandless not deserve love? Do we know enough about MS to say with any certainty that it is a no-fault condition? How do we know it wasn't because of something I did a long time ago?
And what did McCandless "do to himself" except embark on a spiritual journey to achieve parity with truth? His pilgrimage had a bad outcome, but if it had a good outcome, we would not be knocking him his journey. Some would lionize him, even. Sometimes you do things to yourself and you get praised or rewarded. Not so much for our hero-fool. But you must admit, you wanted him to win. You wanted him to survive.
It's the same for me; people want me to win, want me to survive. Whether I have done anything to myself prior to diagnosis is a big question mark. For me, the goal now is to not do something devastating to myself now. And that will be my challenge from here on out. Which means being a guinea pig and wandering an untamed wilderness. Like McCandless admits at the end of the movie, he was not only lonely, but scared. I would be lying if I said I didn't feel this way some of the time (especially the latter). But what else is there to do, but move forward?
SHIT HAPPENS, PEOPLE
My MS diagnosis is one example of this contemporary adage. If I turn into a potato bug, curl up and die, then it is a bad outcome that is actually of my own doing. I cannot change certain realities, but I can change how I respond to them, and I've chosen to respect truth and hope at the same time. Who knows what my outcome will be. Today, it's good, but nobody knows what will happen tomorrow.
We cannot begrudge McCandless his own journey to find truth. Survival mechanisms notwithstanding, each and every one of us has a fate over which we have little control. McCandless also did not curl up into a potato bug and succumb to his family's abuses (which is more commonly how people "survive" similar situations in their own lives). Nor did he flinch at the idea of taking on survival in the Alaskan terrain. There is courage in there as well as naivete. Yes, he carried some faulty notions about how to survive, but in the end I still think he did better than most of us would in that singular situation of living off the land.
(Here, the snarky me wants to point out that he totally forgot about that fishing pole... Dude! You are in Alaska! Go fishing! I can't resist sharing this.)
But you know what? All bad taste and judgmentalism aside, I think he found what he was looking for. He found it in the apple, in playing music, in his visit to Salvation, in thwarting the river police after he kayaked without a permit. He found freedom, love, happiness and beauty.
How about you? What would happen if you decided to seek truth? How far would you go? And for you, would it be a hero's story or a fool's errand?
You will never know without trying. Have you? Have you tried?
----
So that's what spills forth after someone with MS watches a movie about survival (or failure to survive). I'm sure my theories and arguments are full of holes, but heck, so's my brain.
- This blog.
- Talking with friends.
- Researching.
- Celebrating what I can do.
- Learning resilience.
- Having a sense of humor
But I'm not going there. I am not in an all-or-nothing situation. To me, that's like cutting off my finger to heal a mosquito bite. If I was sicker, maybe my perspective would change. But that's not my reality. And I don't think it was McCandless's reality, either. He had other options that were less extreme. He just made different choices.
Also, unlike McCandless, I have not formally started a training routine like others with MS have, partially because:
- I am concerned about digestive issues that could really ruin a good long walk (trust me on this one)
- I am lazy (because I can be)
- I am exhausted (because my brain still wants to work at a higher capacity than the nerves can maintain)
- I have arthritis and carpal tunnel as well and these just make me hurt more when I exercise; when it comes to MS, No Pain does not equal No Gain, it equals Relapse Potential
- I actually don't have any mobility issues (except for an overly mobile bowel, whoops)
- I think that what I'm doing for now is probably good enough
As for the diet, I am relentless in my rejection of the notion of diet. Diets in America consist of self-deprivation, failures in common sense, major monetary expenditures, herd mentality and practices which are completely unsustainable. MS is not just happening to me "in the now," like McCandless's starvation did as a slow and gradual end game that ultimately could not be blamed on eating an inedible plant. My MS will happen forever, whether I eat candy bars or chia seeds, whether I sit on my ass all day long or complete a marathon.
And more about eating... and this is relevant because every single person I know with MS has encountered this from nonMSers to the point of oversaturation... All y'all please read this carefully:
Cutting out whole food groups to "heal" my MS is careless, stressful and unsustainable, and my naturopath has already confirmed I don't need to cut out anything but foods with sulfites (usually meaning wine, certain kinds of dried fruit and cured meats, all of which I can easily live without). So yes, I'm eating gluten and sugar. And so are people who say they are gluten-free or Paleo. They are secretly (or, in some cases, ignorantly) eating gluten and sugar. Even the true Celiac sufferers I know break down from time to time.
In this way, McCandless and I are on the same page: we just want the truth. Here's one for ya: Diets to cure neurological conditions are a FUCKING LIE, people. Neurological conditions are not metabolic in origin. Diets DO NOT CURE most chronic or serious illnesses that are not metabolic in origin.
I've also kept records like McCandless, though they are fewer and far between because I am between flare ups (I think? I'm still trying to figure this out..) and there's nothing new to record that can't be explained by my own bad behavior (not getting enough sleep, too much emotional stress, eating fat too late at night, etc.).
I have also prepared in some ways for my big lurch into the unknown by cobbling together a mini yoga studio in my office, investing in comfortable shoes, napping before I head off to work at the sleep lab, and saying No to the daily demands that side-swipe every parent in American nearly every day of their life (i.e. to bake cookies, sell tickets, drive kids, organize a car wash, attend a board meeting, revise a phone tree, volunteer at the play, set up for the swim meet, etc etc and etc.).
In this way, I am also like McCandless. My journey is decidedly an imperfect practice, a work in progress. I can probably do more. He could have probably done more. His life was also a work in progress. So is yours. Somewhere between all that planning and philosophizing, one has to actually live. And I have a family and a job and friends that matter just as much as the battle against the war inside me.
HOW IT WILL ALL END
So... going back to the truth... The truth is, I will die, just like McCandless.
Obviously, my distaste for diets means I won't die of starvation. But I will die because, heck, we all die. You will die, too. Sometimes people take risks or make lousy choices, and they die. And sometimes people live sheltered or impeccable lives and, guess what? They die, too! The truth sucks, no?
I might die tomorrow of a stroke. I might die on the day of my daughter's graduation of a urinary tract infection that the MS can't abide. I might die ten years from now because someone didn't vaccinate their kid on philosophical grounds, leaving me to cough up a pertussic lung in a hospital after encountering their darling precious little germ factory at Safeway. I might get hit by a bus on my 65th birthday. I might fall down the stairs at the old folks home because of my MS. I might have a heart attack, which is more in line with my familial reality, while in my 80s.
In my 80s. So if I die in my 80s, then I lived a full life, right? Right??
However, I won't die by isolating myself from society.
Hey, I know what McCandless is fighting against. Society is full of shitheads, complete morons, bigots, twisted family monarchs and automatons. But it's also full of lightworkers, geniuses, selfless strangers, peacemakers, and freethinkers with hearts and souls at least the size of the bus McCandless co-opted in INTO THE WILD. I see these people every day in my life: they walk around thinly disguised as old friends, new friends, people on the ferry, service providers, random teenagers, voices on the phone.
So you can also rest well knowing that I probably won't die of suicide; that's something I feel I can safely put out there. I love people too much. The good ones, anyway. The ones who share, the ones with whom I can share.
Remember, it wasn't as if McCandless was miserable 100 percent of the time while on his journey. He certainly wasn't miserable while belly laughing with Mr. Hanz on the top of the hill, and he wasn't miserable while enjoying his handmade shower in Alaska or accompanying his "girlfriend" Tracy in a song at Slab City or swimming in the ocean, despite the fact he had a deep fear of water. His journey overflowed with joy, even over the taste and texture of a perfect apple (one of my favorite scenes, actually).
On the other hand, McCandless used a hat woven for him by a potential surrogate mother as a trail marker across the river; it was still there when he finally got the clue that maybe happiness was meant to be spent out in the world made most beautiful by those who loved him, but by then it was too late for him. He did not see the orange knit cap as the truth beacon it was. How very tragic, that a handmade gift could have delivered Tolstoy's message weeks, months to McCandless before he set off for Alaska.
One could say the other difference between us is that I don't deserve the MS, that he deserved to die of starvation. And another argument might be that McCandless did all this to himself and I didn't. Both are pretty flimsy.
What does it mean to deserve anything? Did OxFam not deserve his check for $25K? Did his friend Mr. Hanz deserve to lose his wife and child while away serving in the war? Did McCandless not deserve love? Do we know enough about MS to say with any certainty that it is a no-fault condition? How do we know it wasn't because of something I did a long time ago?
And what did McCandless "do to himself" except embark on a spiritual journey to achieve parity with truth? His pilgrimage had a bad outcome, but if it had a good outcome, we would not be knocking him his journey. Some would lionize him, even. Sometimes you do things to yourself and you get praised or rewarded. Not so much for our hero-fool. But you must admit, you wanted him to win. You wanted him to survive.
It's the same for me; people want me to win, want me to survive. Whether I have done anything to myself prior to diagnosis is a big question mark. For me, the goal now is to not do something devastating to myself now. And that will be my challenge from here on out. Which means being a guinea pig and wandering an untamed wilderness. Like McCandless admits at the end of the movie, he was not only lonely, but scared. I would be lying if I said I didn't feel this way some of the time (especially the latter). But what else is there to do, but move forward?
SHIT HAPPENS, PEOPLE
My MS diagnosis is one example of this contemporary adage. If I turn into a potato bug, curl up and die, then it is a bad outcome that is actually of my own doing. I cannot change certain realities, but I can change how I respond to them, and I've chosen to respect truth and hope at the same time. Who knows what my outcome will be. Today, it's good, but nobody knows what will happen tomorrow.
We cannot begrudge McCandless his own journey to find truth. Survival mechanisms notwithstanding, each and every one of us has a fate over which we have little control. McCandless also did not curl up into a potato bug and succumb to his family's abuses (which is more commonly how people "survive" similar situations in their own lives). Nor did he flinch at the idea of taking on survival in the Alaskan terrain. There is courage in there as well as naivete. Yes, he carried some faulty notions about how to survive, but in the end I still think he did better than most of us would in that singular situation of living off the land.
(Here, the snarky me wants to point out that he totally forgot about that fishing pole... Dude! You are in Alaska! Go fishing! I can't resist sharing this.)
But you know what? All bad taste and judgmentalism aside, I think he found what he was looking for. He found it in the apple, in playing music, in his visit to Salvation, in thwarting the river police after he kayaked without a permit. He found freedom, love, happiness and beauty.
How about you? What would happen if you decided to seek truth? How far would you go? And for you, would it be a hero's story or a fool's errand?
You will never know without trying. Have you? Have you tried?
 |
Just a reminder... Chris McCandless (aka Alexander Supertramp) was a real human being who made some devastatingly bad choices, but at least he was seeking truth in his life. I can't help but be compelled to honor him for that. |
----
So that's what spills forth after someone with MS watches a movie about survival (or failure to survive). I'm sure my theories and arguments are full of holes, but heck, so's my brain.
